Rules Adjudication
Texto
While the GM and players are collaborating to tell a story, the GM is ultimately the arbiter of all rules matters. The GM should attempt to keep the pace moving during a game session and not get too bogged down in looking up details at the table—they can always reference the relevant sections later to clarify the correct way things should be resolved in the future.
The players should endeavor to support the GM rather than undermining them. Players should feel free to offer their interpretations of a rule when it becomes relevant, or if the GM asks, but they should let the ruling stand once the GM has made it. Discussing the rules after a session can be one way to untangle unclear issues or apparent contradictions.
Texto do livro
Core Rulebook · Chapter 7: The Game Master › Running the Game › Rules Adjudication · p. 296
Mostrar o texto como impresso
While the GM and players are collaborating to tell a story, the GM is ultimately the arbiter of all rules matters. The GM should attempt to keep the pace moving during a game session and not get too bogged down in looking up details at the table—they can always reference the relevant sections later to clarify the correct way things should be resolved in the future.
The players should endeavor to support the GM rather than undermining them. Players should feel free to offer their interpretations of a rule when it becomes relevant, or if the GM asks, but they should let the ruling stand once the GM has made it. Discussing the rules after a session can be one way to untangle unclear issues or apparent contradictions.